Sunday, 8 December 2019

Tunbridge Wells Constituency General Elections 1885-2019

I don't know if Tunbridge Wells has always had a Conservative or a Unionist MP but it has been at least since 1885, except for 1906.  Until 1910 the Liberal Party came a close second or won in 1906 and during the 1950s the Labour Party also came close to winning the seat.  From the 1980s until 2010 Lib-Dems had been second but they have moved to 3rd or 4th place whilst the Labour Party had been gaining ground again since the end of the 1980s.

The 2019 General Election timing was chosen by the Conservative prime minister for best advantage for that party, with help of the Lib-Dem leader and despite having fixed term parliaments.  Generally, electors rejecting coalition of any sort despite, Michael Heseltine, John Major, Tony Blair and others recommending something like that.   Locally the Lib-Dem's gained by heavy leafleting (the number of trees lost did not count against them) despite the usual trend but Labour fielded a candidate with an out of the constituency address.

There was a short time when Conservatives did not run Tunbridge Wells Borough Council and Kent County Council in the 1990s.  You can also see the inevitable downward trend in Labour voting in General Elections when Labour was in power this effect is not apparent in Conservative voting in general elections.  Conservatives vote for other party's some making a point of voting Labour in local elections when they don't like what their party is doing nationally.  Also in Local Elections from 1990 Labour followed an upward trend but in General elections the trend fitted the pattern I suggested and the trend was downward whilst Labour was in government.

Observations from looking at the data and discussion;

Before WW1 - General Elections probably happened when members chose to step aside.  So there was a more gradual change - the system seemed fairer but that the franchise was only for men with property. 

We could do with both the franchise widened plus that voters all getting to vote without problems.  We could do with the media to behave better or be shut down completely.  I am sure people feel they got it wrong because they listen to the media so don't vote next time.  


The 2019 election;

Conservatives have been winning elections for the past 30 years by promising to leave the EU to a minority but not delivering that promise.  This has been a good strategy for them because their is no other party likely to carry out leave.

Even if we never have another Labour government.  Momentum, Jeremy Corbyn and his team have inspired a considerable number of people to get into politics for the good.   People of an alternative viewpoints voted who have never voted in 40 years.   The Labour opposition have high success rate in opposing successfully many of the a very nasty party's measures.   That nasty party could not change but instead beat its own MPs in to line.  Perhaps even Mrs May wanted change but there were Conservatives who said the last 40 years were a mistake - in this election campaign.  That has been said across party's for a few decades.

Lib-Dem leader gave this election to the Conservatives by letting them chose when it wanted an election.  Of cause the Conservative government chose before Brexit so that Leave campaign did much of the work.  The outcome though is that all party's followed Labour's look after the little people promises in there manifesto's.  Still I am not expecting Boris Johnson to be a Socialist in Wolves clothing?


Mistake of the environmental campaign in the 1990s may now be overcome;

The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament were very effective taking care not to divide amongst themselves on strategy.  The old guard from the 1960s guided new member's well from 1979 when Cruise Missiles and Theatre nuclear war was being deployed for in the UK and Europe.  In the 1990's the environmental groups divided and criticise strategy's.  They employed advocates rather than environmentalists and activists.  The environment, social rights and other things than self interest have started to inspire more young adults again.  

Presentation prepared for; Extinction Rebellion London University's Strand the Strand event in September 2019 that was broken up by the police. Based professor Keith Barnham's book, The Burning Answer;


The young people must not give up - they share the same enthusiasm that people now over 85  had in 1945.  The 2019 Labour Manifesto was more easily achievable and exciting however they voted.  The manifesto did not have the an anti-nuclear war policy that the 1980s Labour manifestos had despite that policy having been supported now by the public for the past 20 years.

References;

1885-1910 Tunbridge constituency;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunbridge_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

1916 No general election due to World War 1.  Term reduced to 5 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Kingdom_general_elections

1918-1970 Tonbridge Constituency.  Franchise widened to Women and people without property.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonbridge_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

1974-2018 (present) Tunbridge Wells Constituency

BBC 2019 election results.

Turn out percentage for 1956 found in a government document found on the web.  The figure looks correct for the given the poll.

Post General Election Momentum and The Labour Party - this video might be deleted?
https://www.facebook.com/JeremyCorbynMP/videos/448002489199292/

Pre-election warning - I am in any-case very surprised out how well Labour and Momentum did inspiring people mostly younger voters but also voters over age 85 who remember how it was before the NHS.   Those now very old voters liked the manifesto seeing simply a 1945 Labour manifesto.
https://bsnews.info/the-plot-to-keep-corbyn-out-of-power/?fbclid=IwAR1pDEGO_HaBgVQSuIImFUn05AAgTOsOZ0YSov24NRk6EzOguftXQwObA4Y


Thursday, 18 July 2019

Bicycle Hub Dynamo maintenance

Changed; 25/07/2021 to 26/07/2021
Pictured; Sturmey-Archer, AG - 3-speed Dynohub, dated July 1953;
3-speed wide variable gear hub and 6Vac, 2W generator, 40 spoke

Temporarily copied and repairing this blog;

The first impression - the sprocket turns both directions without engaging and was floppy but after dismantling, reassembling, and lubricating the gear hub is free running, it should feel loose which it does.  The case is bright chrome with some rust and the internals seen from the outside are dirty black dry oil and dry inside.  It has not been oiled adequately probably not assembled correctly and the toggle chain is missing - this Dynohub's condition is unknown. 

The dynamo - feels dirty but does not feel like there is any internal rubbing.  Turning the dynamo is definitely lumpy as would be expected as the poles line up but the magnetic force is quite high - which could mean the winding is shorted and/or the magnet is in a very good state of magnetism. 

Once the terminals were tightened there was good continuity.  Shorting the contacts make's the magnet detent force stronger (harder to over come) as should happen and indicates that the winding is not shorted. That is as far as I can tell over the friction from internal dirt at first but now that everything is put back together properly, lubricated the hub runs fine and appears to be in good order. 

On opening the Dynohub it becomes apparent that the magnetism is not particularly strong and it is quite easy to slide the winding assembly against the magnet.  The magnet is old for the time, probably AlNiCo type that would never have been particularly strong.  The air gap, as expected, is large by modern standards of motors and generators but that is because it uses the same weight carrying bearings as the wheel this lowers the Dynohub's power a lot.  It is likely that the magnet was not fully magnetised but probably magnetised using a calibration procedure to set the required output current. 

Pictured above right;  Stronger ceramic/ferrite type magnet from a 1950s or early 60s TV.

Summary - Mechanically the Dynohub was made like all Sturmey-Archer / Raleigh products of good quality materials, to be maintained and serviced straightforwardly over their very long life span.   I have read that Sturmey-Archer Dynohubs were sold with a 50-year guarantee in 1950 or forever if was on a Raleigh bicycle.  But they were not redesigned to use more powerful magnets, therefore be more efficient, have more power output, and lower material costs until the 1980s when such a dynohub and lighting was developed, prototypes sampled, but never sold.  Manufacture of Dynohubs ceased at that time (See Sturmey-Archer History by Tony Hadland). 


Objective;
To discuss the electrical issue with some textbook motor and generator theory.  This type of generator is the same as a single-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor.  These motors used to be used in electromechanical central heating timers.  They are also similar to a hybrid stepper motor that has; two, three, four or five phases, usually operate at low speed and are found in printers to wind turbines.  All so-called bicycle dynamos but have no brushes and the term is incorrect.  "Dynohub" does not appear to be a trademark but the logo would be copyright.  If the magnet is re-magnetised successfully then the Dynohub should produce a higher current at 6Vac than the rated 300mA at a lower speed. 

Graph - Expected current can be drawn up to the same limit irrespectively of the generator speed and then the voltage will drop sharply.  The winding's series resistance has not been included it causes the voltage to drop as the current increases. 
Small graph - With no load, the output voltage increases linearly proportionally to the speed of rotation.  A lightly loaded dynamo is the same as a tachometer and would make a good speedometer. 

In a discussion on Facebook, I have been shown the patent below which claims a method of providing some voltage regulation rather than current regulation that I suggest above - load voltage regulation is claimed.  The magnet is machined in a way to form discrete poles so that the magnetism does not slip around and presumably be weakened more quickly.  The claim is also that the current reaches the desired level quickly - That would occur in any case by having a lot of poles and a high number of turns/volts coil.  The graphs with the patent do show some voltage regulation when loaded.  The description also mentions reactance of the winding being a limiting/regulating factor but I am not sure how this helps to model a generator? 

The patent is dated 1936 - I found it difficult to understand.  I would appreciate your comment below.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/010021742/publication/GB481585A?q=481585&fbclid=IwAR0qBBuHiTWfkYmO0suHoAIKgwdaiyGf64eF_zqRUdi-EkUYYaM6X8VNlAc

Tests below show that the dynamo behaves as a fairly constant current source and the open-circuit voltage output increases with speed.  Therefore the diagrams are roughly correct. 
 
Efficiency;
 
The losses in the Dynohub are due to; 
  • Bearing friction which is very small in this case of a thin oiled bearing.
  • Magnetising force - the power needed to change the magnetism polarity in the iron conducting the magnetism to the winding this is very small and might be 1% of the maximum power available for the given frequency which can be determined by looking at the B-H curve for the material. 
  • Eddy currents in the iron conducting the changing magnetism this depends on how thinly it is laminate.  GH6 bike Dynohubs are probably a little lossier because the metal is not thinly laminated but is just three laminations compared to a transformer.  I have read an anecdote of someone getting one or two hundred volts from a Dynohub by taking it off a bike and spinning it fast, which suggests that eddy currents losses did not limit the output voltage at high frequencies and probably, therefore are not a significant issue. 
  • Copper losses are the losses due to the resistance of the winding when current is drawn is a significant factor, though not discernible by the cyclist;  I2*R which is; 0.45W = 0.32 x 5 in this case. 
  • There is a reduction in available current output as the power is taken and voltage output increases.  It is not clear from the tests below but can be seen with the experimental bottle generator, in that case, is -24% at 35V, 23mA output instead of 30mA at 0V see; Bicycle Dynamo maximum power and battery charging manager the construction of this motor is cheaper and more similar to a Dynohub, Is not designed for high frequency chopped drive or high speed and the eddy current losses may become the significant loss in this case? 
  • A different effect is observed and said on social media: a Dynohub which on small wheel bicycle's turns faster and when cycling on a full-size bike fast tends to burn out filament lamps, that is the output current increases a little with speed.  This can be observed in tests below but would not be perceived to the eye with LED lighting much.  By comparison, a filament lamp has a positive resistance temperature coefficient that tends to cause its power take to increase a lot and colour change more for a small increase in current.  This effect is not apparent in the experimental bottle generator where the output is 30.5mA except at low speeds.  Also, see the addendum at the bottom of this page AL0035-05A.
A filament lamp's current self regulates a little when supplied from a voltage source such as a battery.  A filament lamp's cold resistance is about 1/20th of its hot resistance for a quartz halogen lamp. 
  • The magnets are low strength in vintage Sturmey-Archer hub generators such as GH6 and consequently the losses magnetising force, and copper losses will be proportionally higher.  A GH6, AG etc uses more copper and iron in compensation but losses may still be higher.  The picture at the bottom of this page of an expensive type stepper motor disassembled showing the magnetic design has a short path ,with plenty of thin lamination's in-line with the alternating magnetic path and perpendicular with the potential current path.  These have three, four, five up to eight winding pictured. 
  • Expect a vintage GH6 Dynohub to be less efficient because the magnet is lower-powered but a Dynohub 
    • A modern hub generators losses are more than 10% of the available power when not connected but varies between makers of modern generators. These are magnetising and eddy current losses that most certainly a. See Skjegg blog link below for measurements carried out on some modern hub generators.
    • But the losses are a lot higher in a modern hub generator system (up to 45%). See Skjegg blog link below for measurements carried out on some modern hub generators. The electronics waste power instead of use more sophistication to just take the power required. 
    • The amount of power wasted in a modern hub generator additional system may be 7W compared to 2-3W in AL-0035-04A below or 1W for AL-0035-01? 4. That is if I have understood the two blogs correctly.
AL-0035-04A simple shunt regulator used with vintage filament lamp lighting to improve voltage regulation.  If one lamp fails then the other lamp will not become over-voltage and also fail. Prevent over-voltage and filament lamp failure at higher bicycle speeds or faster spinning small wheel bicycles.  

The power wasted is up to 2W (3W maximum) and any surplus power is returned to help move the bicycle forward.  A Zener shunt regulator like this is not fitted as a standard and is not made by Sturmey-Archer but they can be made or purchased and added. 

The shut regulator only takes what is required or a little more for lighting.  This lighting system probably takes less power from the movement of the bike than modern bike dynamo systems take.  Consequently, there is no surplus for battery charging or anything else.  The design project  https://blog.andrew-lohmann.me.uk/2020/09/electronics-design-project-bicycle.html  offers the best of both strategies and runs LEDs. 

------------------------------------------------

Magnet keeper to prevent demagnetising - if required;
The magnet will demagnetise if separated from the armature so if you remove the armature you need to replace it with a keeper such as another armature. A magnet keeper is a piece of soft iron that conducts magnetism very efficiently. Mu-metal that transformers, motors, generators, and the screen on an old colour TV Cathode Ray Tube use are ideal. The metal should not be bent or hammered because this hardens the metal and reduces the metal's desired qualities so you should minimise the amount of work you do on the metal. 

 Colour TV, Cathode Ray Tube magnetic screening is made of mu-metal.  Microwave oven transformer
with high leakage inductance - pictured left.  Single-phase shaded pole induction motor - pictured right.  
Mains frequency transformers come apart into a bobbin with valuable copper wire, "E" and "I" section mu-metal. The microwave oven transformer with a high leakage inductance pictured is welded and will probably be difficult to take apart, therefore look for another transformer. The motor's mu-metal will need some more cutting to make it useful. Very old mains and loudspeaker transformers are not varnished so come apart easily for example. The colour TV cathode-ray-tube screen is the best source of mu-metal as can be seen in the picture. 

The Plan to make a keeper - if required;
To cut a piece of mu-metal and carefully bend it into a radius. In more detail like a C shape but with the ends overlapping. I had planned to make the metal strip with one end folded up so it could be pulled out but the magnet turns out not to be as strong as I was expecting.

The estimate of the dimensions from outside dimensions;
  • BSA and others - many sizes not known. 
  • Sturmey-Archer;
    • GH12 (1937-44), 111mm outside diameter (from pictures). 12V, 2.7W, and 3W,
    • GH8 (1939-44), 90mm OD (from pictures), 8V, 1.2W,
    • GH6 hub dynamo (1944 - 83), AG and FG variable gear hub-dynamos.  6V, 2W (reduced to 1.8W subsequently). 
      • The estimated magnet internal diameter measuring inside the bolts is; 70mm. and width 24mm,
      • The length required of mu-metal required is the circumference;  210mm = pi.D.
      • Therefore ensure there is at least 230 x 30mm mu-metal. 
I understand that all post-world war two Sturmey-Archer dyno-hubs and gear dyno hubs are the same and parts interchangeable.  The external appearance changed from time to time though. 

Picture - Making the keeper;  Find a glass jar of about the right diameter, wrap it in a rage, and then bend the mu-metal around the protected jar.  The kitchen scissors are described as cut anything up to tin plate steel and are more suitable than the tin snips on the right.  A hammer, anvil (use a vice with care), and a file to clean up the cut edges. 
I have some mu-metal and have cut a piece 30mm x 260mm x 0.5mm - it looks messy because I used kitchen scissors and it would be better cut with a guillotine to make a magnet keeper for a GH12 hub-dynamo. I bent the strip of mu-metal around the glass jar wrapped in a rag to form into a C shape radius.

---------------------------------------------- 

The variable hub gear and other bicycle parts are made to loose-tolerances So that no moving parts should feel stiff or tight. That is they tolerate grit and dirt with the minimum of harmful wear. Frequent oiling is necessary to lubricate, flush out dirt and moisture. 

By comparison, the synchro and servo, gear-heads and tacho or Syncro resolver pictured right are expensive precision components used in precision instruments. There is virtually no slack or stiffness in them. They were supplied in the tightly fitting plastic pack shown and were made in the 1960s by Vartec. These components can be stacked end to end and they fit firmly. Synchros and servos are used in a clean dry environment but will continue to work in a dirty environment with some moisture. The military uses them but they are rarely used in industry now. 

Syncros and servos were developed for use to compute gun rang during World War 2 one of the lectures at college I attended was one of those wartime boffins who worked on gun ranging.  They rapidly add angles and indicate alignment with computed range. 

Disassembly of the dynamo section;
The magnet is brittle and is pressed into a soft metal enclosure that has water excluding greased lip.  There is also a cardboard washer protector shown with intellectual property details printed on it.  It is not necessary to move the wiring and it is best avoided doing that unless there is an issue with continuity or insulation. 

  

A dynamo hub bearings and the variable gears can be serviced without separating the magnetic parts. In this case, the magnet moves around the winding freely and the inside looks clean enough not to require removing the armature and inserting the keeper. Although the amount of cleaning will be limited anyway. 

I have used a mole wrench to hold the shaft by the not threaded flat sides, a 15mm ring spanner for the nuts on the shaft, and a 5mm nut-spinner for the 8BA nuts that hold the dynamo section together (the 5mm socket I have is too fat). The magnet has 20 poles in this picture. 

I have wiped to clean the surfaces then rubbed the surfaces with grease. I have also pushed the coil a little way out of the magnet it moves too easily it should be difficult to move, indicating that the magnet has weakened over time. But turns out that the output current is correct so the magnet is okay.

The bearing can be seen the adjustment can be made from inside or also the adjustment can be made with the dynamo section assembled using the remote adjuster picture on the bottom left corner of the tray of parts.  I recommend that the variable gear section be opened and checked, but if you are not going to touch the variable gear section, ensure that this bearing is adjusted correctly. 

If the hub does not have an oil port then the bearings do need to be greased.  This Dynohub does not require greasing and this internal bearing does not have a water-repelling seal.  In this case, oil gets to all bearings and other parts.

------------------------------------------------------

Inspecting the variable gear section bearings, greased and adjusting; 
Note that the GH6 front wheel fitted type hub dynamo bearing adjustment is carried out from the non-dynamo side.  See; https://youtu.be/2SnEkpU0YeU  

 
Video shows AW hub disassembly and that the drive side bearing is set to 1/4 to 1/2 turn slack and the non-drive side is set after the drive side bearing to 1/2 turn of slack.  There are some differences and I have shown a tray of parts for the dyno-hub with the dynamo side bearing disassembled. 

One difference with the variable gears only hub is that there is no press-fitting bearing oil trap so that a little lubrication from the variable gear will spread into the dynamo section.  The rust seen in the picture is a little greasy.   The hub should not be greased other than a little to hold the balls in place so that the bearing can be assembled.  This is a little different to the advice given in many videos.

The outer bearings have a grease-filled grove to repel water that grove needs any hard old grease to be scraped out and new grease packed into it.  These water barriers are the only parts that should be greased in a variable gear dynohub.  There is another water-repelling greased grove between the stationary connections plate and the rotating hub.  The large bearing in the gear hub has a little oil running out taking dirt and moisture with it.

Note; It turns out that variable gear is complete and disassembly and assembly is straightforward.  Do use the video or other sources for maintenance information.  You should not need to disassemble as far as the video shows you but also look at the planetary gears for timing marks an AG or AW does not have them but some variable gear hubs do and they must all be aligned when you re-assemble the hub.  Front dynohub maintenance video. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  

Hercules Balmoral 1975 AW variable gear hub, by comparison with a Dynohub; 
  • Put grease in the grove around the bearing to form a water seal, I have put the grease in the nut but not in the bearing side yet. 
  • Hold the shaft still in a vice lightly on the flat sides of the shaft, set the slack in the bearing by tightening the cone-nut then loosen 1/2 turn.  Then tighten the locknut whilst holding the cone-nut still with the thin spanner. 
  • Modern bikes with shorter stroke brake leavers and a magnetic sensor for a bike computer will need the bearing set with less slack say 1/8 turn and the spokes kept very well adjusted.  But do not expect such a bike to last 100 years with the balls in the bearings changed every 100,000 miles. 
This 1975 AW was in sound order internally but leaked rusty oil after oiling and riding. 

Another AW dated 1985 did not run or changed speed smoothly until it had been oiled regularly for a year or so.  During that time black muck came out of the hub.  When I opened the hub two years later the hub was clean inside but there was a detached pawl spring (high-speed freewheel), I made another with some success from a strand of brake cable but it is better to buy another spring. (I felt the spring being mangled, a few months later, and have obtained another from a bike shop)

In conclusion, the gear hub needs oiling and you can not over oil it because the oil will come out of the larger bearing carrying water and dirt with it.  The inside won't be bathed in oil consequently. Older hubs oiler port do not have a sealed cap so excess oil would also overflow out so keeping the transmission as light as possible by using enough but not an excessive amount of oil. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Picture right; Broken old type indicator rod and toggle chain from an FW variable gear hub.  The indicator rod will fly out if you simply unscrew the toggle chain on the hub made up until about 1950.  On such an older hub with an indicator rod, unscrew the indicator rod so that the toggle chain the other side can slide out. 

There is one spacer between the drive sprocket and the variable gear but the video above shows two spacers and it is important to put them back as they were found.  The sprocket needed to be put back the other way like the video and another bike that I have.  In conclusion, if this dynamo were to be used on another bike the location of the spacer or spacers would need to be reviewed.

I was able to test the function of the variable gear by screwing an old thread type thin 1.5mm spoke into the toggle chain place and see that the variable gear operates properly.  The 3-speed Dynohub's gears have not been road-tested on a bicycle.

Tony Hadland - How to repair old Sturmey-Archer hubs


Magnet keeper - if required;
You can push the keeper or another winding, as a keeper, in from one side and thereby push the existing winding out for inspection and cleaning.  See TEST 4 below if you need to take this step which shows a procedure and measured outcome. 

I have been told by one person who did not have a keeper and separated the magnets to clean it then put it back successfully.  But do not do that, there is no easy way of remagnetising the magnet.

-----------------------------------------------------

Testing the dynamo;

 1. With the bike wheel off the ground so that it can be spun freely; 
  • GH 12 - I believe the circuit is two 6V filament lamps in series rated at 150 mA.  Short one lamp to see if the other lamp illuminates then short the other lamp this will determine if there is a simple lamp failure. 
  • GH 8  - I believe the circuit is two 4V filament lamps in series rated at 250 mA.  If the circuit is the same as the GH 12 then the test is the same. 
  • GH 6 - The circuit is two 6V filament lamps in parallel rated at 100 mA and 200 mA. If one lamp fails then the other lamp will be supplied with too much current and fail.  Therefore, turn the wheel slowly at first to see if one or both lamps illuminate. 
  • All hub types operate silently but for the ticking of the freewheel. 
2. With the wheel removed from the bike, the hub is set up ànd lubricated if necessary so that it  is running freely;
  • Turn the shaft and notice the dynamo detent force - which feels springy sort of lumpy and is very light.  It does not matter which direction the wheel is rotated in.  The magnet is magnetised.
  • Short the dynamo output with a wire.  Turn the shaft and notice the dynamo stronger magnet detent force - which feels springy lumpy but takes more effort.   The magnet is magnetised and the windings are good so the dynamo is good
If the force was no different as described the winding probably has a short circuit or the connection is an open circuit. 
  • Check the continuity with a battery and a lightbulb or a multimeter.
If there was no detent force felt then the magnet is demagnetised.

If there is doubt about the lamp and the dynamo circuits test the lamp circuit with a battery instead of the dynamo.  Of cause, you can test with a multimeter rather than traditional methods but a multimeter in its time such as an AVO would cost more than a new bike in the 1930s.  The current from a battery and lamp continuity tester connected to the dynamo will cause a small high voltage spark when you disconnect it is called back-EMF. 
 
The moving Iron test meter pictured right is probably 100 years old and had cotton covered wire with a small probe tip.  It works AC or DC but the scale does not say which it is calibrated in.  Notice that the body of the meter is live, I have not carried out any measurements with this meter.  It would have been much less costly than a multimeter but it was not a cheap instrument. 

---------------------------------------
 
The second tool re-magnetising the magnet; 
This is the same process that happens with a computer hard disk.  A high pulse of magnetism is applied to the hard iron material to magnetise it.  Such a pulse will also switch a magnets polarity north and south poles. This is done with the dynamo fully maintained and assembled then briefly connecting a high voltage direct current power source with a circuit breaker or fuse and protection diode to the Dynohub output.

Providing that the mu-metal can carry this amount of magnetism without saturating - which is very likely because motors and generators are usually assembled then magnetised after assembly in this way. 

There is a risk that the high voltage applied to the dynamo winding will cause the insulation to break down.  The winding needs to be dry but the insulation may have deteriorated over time so applying a high voltage to the winding may cause it to fail. 

I have not carried out this procedure at high voltage consequently but I have tried the procedure at a lower voltage inconclusively and have suggested a method below.  It is most likely that the insulation will withstand high voltage if it is dry and has not disturbed but the very old enamel on the copper wire is brittle and flakes off if the wire is moved.  Enamelled copper wire in anything made after about 1950-1960 is much better and retains flexibility. 

 
 


AL-0030-02B S1 is closed briefly then opened to re-magnetise the dynamo.  When S1 is closed the current starts to rise in the dynamo winding represented by L1, 5.5H (measured and calculated roughly) and R1 5Ω (measured).  D1 prevents the circuit from creating a high voltage (back EMF), arcing which will hurt you and damage the dynamo's insulation. 

 

RED = VoltsGREEN = Amps.
The Ground symbol shown is not earth but is a reference point for this SiMetrix simulation.  

20A pulse shown is probably the current required to fully magnetise the dynamo (guessing based on patent detail above and the B-H curves below). It is necessary to remagnetise the Dynohub with the lowest possible voltage because of the age of its insulation it needs to be clean and dry, but without causing undue heating due to the longer time required to attain a high enough current.  Therefore just enough current be applied to magnetise the dynohub. Expect the Dynohubs output to be a higher current than rated. These magnets have a wide tolerance in magnetic strength consequently the increase in the dynamo's output may vary.  The winding current must be less than the fuse rating of the wire but I do not know what the thickness of the wire is?

 Assume that thinned copper wire fuse rating is similar to enamelled copper wire used in the dynohub; https://www.powerstream.com/wire-fusing-currents.htm
Estimate
Winding bobbin ID; 42mm, OD; 58mm, Width; 13mm = 18mm-5mm, Winding fill factor; 75%.
Cross-sectional Area; 156mm2 = (42-58) * 13mm * 75%
Mean length; 157mm = π * (42 + 58) / 2 [π × mean diameter]
Resistance of one turn of copper wire; 12.7uΩ
Multiplier for; 628.5 = √(5Ω / 12.7E-6Ω),
Wire; 628.5 turns of 0.25mm2 = 156mm2 / 628.5, diameter; 0.5mm.  Length; 98674.5 = 628.5 * 157mm.
For a GH6 dynamo,  a short pulse of current up to 20A probably won't cause the winding to break open-circuit. 

Diagram right;  AL-0030-01C but at 350Vdc, 20A is attained in 0.4 Seconds and less heating. But more of the self-heating occurs after the current is turned off (the area under the curve is larger).  This can be reduced by fitting a ~10R power resistor or a surge suppressor in series with the diode. 

Include a quick blow fuse in the circuit before the rectifier in case any part breaks down, for safety, it may also save the Dynohub from damage. Progressively increasing the voltage or the fuse rating up to 5A or 10A (will break in 0.5 seconds at 3-4 times its rated current) until the dynamo's magnet has become stronger.  It is likely that a suitable high-power bridge rectifier will be found in an old washing machine. 

A rectified mains supply is more practical.  The simulation AL-0030-03C - the rectified ac component in the red supply voltage pulse.  230VAC with rectifier 0.7 Seconds to reach 20A. 

The simulation is similar to the battery charger circuit below but operating from 230VAC with no transformer.   A fuse - switch - circuit breaker - and a mains voltage high current bridge rectifier need to be added but the ammeter and capacitor are not included. 

I HAVE NOT CARRIED OUT THIS PROCEDURE AT MAINS VOLTAGE AND I DO NOT INTEND TO.   IT IS DANGEROUS EVEN THOUGH I RECOMMEND USING A CIRCUIT BREAKER TO LIMIT THE CURRENT QUICKLY SO PROTECT THE DYNAMO.  I ALSO RECOMMEND AN EARTH LEAKAGE CIRCUIT BREAKER (ELCB OR RCD) FOR SAFETY. 
I did not want to damage a good Dynohub.

Ensure that the armature can move freely the poles will then align ready for the pulse of current to re-magnetise.  You can test the magnetism by turning the armature if it feels lumpier the strength of the magnet has been increased successfully.  This detent force should be much higher if you short circuit the output to confirm that the winding is not a short circuit or open circuit as a consequence of re-magnetising the magnet. 
    It will be necessary to experiment to find out how much is just enough current so thereby minimise the risk of damaging the Dynohub? 

It would be better to use a variable current power supply so that the magnetism can be steadily increased in steps of pulse, rest to cool, then test until the Dynohub produces the correct current.   That is the magnet is used in the linear region in a similar way that sound is recorded on tape by a tape recorder.   This is unlikely to be practical and the magnet will be magnetised to saturation and the Dynohubs output power will be higher than 300mA. 

Alternatively use a car battery charger;

The car battery charger is connected to the dynamo, the dynamo shaft can move freely so that the magnet poles align when the pulse of power (magnetism) is applied. 

The next step is as before switched on for one or two seconds then switch off.  Take care to switch off quickly so that the dynamo winding does not heat up.  Do not disconnect the dynamo whilst the power is switched on because a high voltage, called back-EMF, will be generated that will put the winding under stress unnecessarily.  See diagram below; 
AL-0031-02B The car battery charger has an internal rectifier diode so another diode is not required.  Connect up then switch on for 10 seconds or so then turn off.  The low or high charge switch setting and then adding the capacitor will progressively increase the current and therefore the resulting dynamo output after re-magnetisation.
It turns out that it takes a few seconds for the current to build up before the armature moves. 

What happens; The armature (generator winding) of the dynamo (generator) will move and the magnet poles (field) and armature segments will align or re-align as the current and the magnetism increases.

Video - Car battery charger used 
to re-magnetise the dynamo.
Ensure that the dynamo can move freely so that the poles can align.  A moving needle multimeter or a filament bulb (2.2V 470mA pictured) does a good job of measuring the function of the dynamos.  Look at the colour of the light to gauge current.  The old capacitors are similarly rated 30V to 63V 2,000uF to 5,600uF and the larger one is older.  

A digital multimeter does work if you keep the hub turning steadily for a longer period and turn off the auto-range feature.  The bulb light up white indicating that the current was 470mA as the light bulb is rated.

It would appear that although the magnet seems weak judging by the how much mu-metal sticks to the magnet but this type of hard iron magnet was going out of fashion in the 1950s and TV manufactures were using stronger ceramic magnets which are black rather than silver.  By holding the shaft in a vice - wrapping string around the housing and pulling voltage and current measurements are difficult to make.

With a digital multimeter, I measured up to 400mA short circuit, although the dynamo is only rated at 300mA.  The current may have risen to 480mA after re-magnetising.   Measuring the open-circuit voltage with a moving needle multimeter was a little easier at up to 12V increased to 20V after re magnetising.  Adding the capacitor to the circuit doubled the current in the dynamo winding but did not, as far as I can tell, increase the power output of the dynamo after a re-magnetising again.

Warning this method was too imprecise to be conclusive.  But the method is correct even though the voltage was not high enough.  Adding the capacitor doubled the current to show 50%, but testing the dynamo showed no further increase in the current output subsequently.  This could be the dynamo is fully re-magnetised or not enough current was applied to change the amount of magnetism.

To properly test this procedure and voltages suggested the dynamo needs to be fully demagnetised.  I could connect the winding to the mains 230V AC this should be adequate.  But that is risky so I am not going to do that.

Tests 1; With the dynamo clamped by the shaft with a vice and string wrapped around the hub body then pulled;

                 Open circuit V, Short circuit I, 12V 6W Lamp
Slow;        <10Vac,               440mA,               <4V
Fast;          20Vac,                 470mA                ~6V
Very fast;  30Vac,                 500mA,               8-10V

The dynamo's output is as originally expected nearly constant current regardless of speed and an open-circuit voltage proportional to the speed of rotation.
 
Repeating the point the measurement is very imprecise and would be greatly improved by fitting the dynamo to the wheel on a bicycle and turning the pedal at a steady speed for longer.


Test 2; Reverse the polarity of the magnet
  • Connect up as above and pulse the power on/off so that the poles align.
  • Reverse the polarity of the power supply.
  • Clamp the dynamo stationary then power on/off.
  • Un-clamp the dynamo so that it can move freely then power on/off.
  • If the magnet polarity had changed the dynamo should not move but it did move to a new alignment.
  • I also tried with a 20V DC power supply unsuccessfully.
The battery charger probably does not provide adequate power to reverse magnetise the dynamo but it has increased the magnetism of the dynamo.  The circuit may be useful.

1. The magnet is not fully saturated and therefore a little more power could be obtained from the dynamo. 

2.  Because the magnet could not be reversed it is also likely that a dynamo which is completely demagnetised would not be re-magnetised without using a much higher voltage and current pulse?


Test 3; Demagnetise the dynamo so that magnetising the dynamo test can be repeated.
  • Connected a 35VAC to the dynamo  - this was not adequate and the dynamo remained magnetised but the magnetism was reduced.
  • The current output but showed the current was reduced to; 380-400mA after the demagnetising experiment.  Then re-magnetising and increased to 400-440mA subsequently.
This test failed to demagnetise the magnet.  I am not willing to use a higher voltage.

WARNING - Test 1 suggests that the dynamo's current output will be higher than rated initially and remained the same after three days and is unlikely to diminish over time.  The dynamo needs to be de-magnetised then re-magnetised but at a lower amount of magnetism.  Alternatively left as it is with higher power output.


Test 4; Replacing the winding with the magnet keeper
 
Pushing the keeper in and whilst pressing the keeper into the magnet to ensure the magnet has minimal gaps and the magnet path is as good as possible.

 


 








 
 

Winding removed - the fingers of the iron are tapered at the furthest tips of the soft iron fingers.
  • The keeper has been made long enough to be used on larger diameter GH8 or GH12 dynamos.
  • Once the Dynohub was re-assembled the power output proved to be uncompromised by having been disassembled.
  • Testing the output voltage peaked at 30Vac as before and the short circuit current varied between 370mA to 420mA slow to fast.
  • The tapered fingers of the coil iron as the magnetic flux lessens would not be done to save materials cost unlike a modern design.  I can not see is not part of some voltage regulation strategy mentioned in the patent.  Any power saving would be trivial due to magnetising loss is reduced.
The assembly did not need cleaning but I did rub the parts with a little grease.  I am advised that the gaps between the magnet poles can be cleaned with a pipe cleaner.
 
 
Test 5 - repeat tests after at least 1 month since re-magnetising the dynamo
 
Slow; Vac open >17V (analogue),  Iac 370mA (digital)
Fast;  Vac open >25V (analogue),  Iac 390mA (digital)
 
The digital multimeter, as before, gave less reliable readings.   
I also measure the average current with the moving needle multimeter and a bridge rectifier and this gave a consistent 300mA fast or slow.  The true value; 330mA (RMS) the meter is 40 years old out of calibration and the needle did not have a long enough period of current flow to settle at a final value.

    Ipk = Iav / 0.637
    Irms = Ipk x 0.707 
    Irms = Iav x 0.707/0.637 
    330mA = 300 x 1.11  -  Warning although the analogue multimeter gives consistent results it most certainly is under reading and the current is higher.

Using a light bulb 2.2V 470mA and 12V 6W I perceive that the dynamo power has diminished a little.  The multimeters tests suggest reduced by 5-10%.  The moving needle multimeter did not fully settle because I was not able to keep the dynamo turning long enough but it gives the most consistent results.


Conclusion - re-magnetising and electrical;
The magnet material has a tolerance but evidently, the magnet was not originally magnetised to its saturation but even so, still has very good retention of magnetism.  With readily available fixed voltage second-hand equipment power supplies it is only possible to re-magnetise a dynamo to give maximum output of about 400mA AC in this case.  

These tests have not proven that the current used to remagnetise the magnet in these experiments was high enough to do that.  I did not want to demagnetise the Dynohub that I have to test this though.

My guess is that a fixed current is used to partially magnetize the magnet to achieve a 300mA dynamo output current.  It is likely that the correct current is found and set for each batch of magnets.

The point about magnetising to saturation is so that the magnet would be as strong as possible but the material used has a broad tolerance.  This tolerance would have made the output power vary between batches of dynamos made. Much more power is required to magnetise the magnet to saturation but the amount of effort required to demagnetise the magnet is also much more.  

Older style block power supplies have very loose regulation so it should be possible to wire a number in parallel in order to achieve the desired current rating and because of their loose regulation the current would be shared fairly equally. 

Pictured right; Old heavy transformer type block power supplies.  These range from 12V, 1A to 1.5A so two in parallel may be enough to re-magnetise a dynamo.  Four in parallel, in series with another four in parallel increase the amount of re-magnetising current.  That is 12V, 2-3A or 24V 4-6A.  Ensure that all are plugged into a gang of sockets then the mains supply to the gang of sockets is switched on briefly then off.  That is so that all the power supplies are switch on and off together.

-----------------------------

Rectifier regulator and LED lighting;

You can scavenge for rectifier diodes from an old PC power supply on the low voltage side diodes are usually more efficient lower voltage drop Schottky types.  Schottky diodes have a low reverse voltage rating of 20V or higher but some newer types are rated at over 100V this means that a low reverse voltage rectifier could be destroyed by the Dynohub at speed if the lamp units are disconnected. 

It is very likely that many working LEDs and optics could be recovered from a broken car head, side and tail light units - generally if one LED fails, open circuit, then the whole unit turns off and a dashboard warning is shown as a legal requirement in order to avoid ambiguity.  These units operate from 5V to 24V and will withstand 60V.  LEDs operate efficiently over a wide current range but their colour may change outside the road-legal red, amber, or white.  The intensity is of each colour is also defined law as is the intensity of the stop or tail light functions. 

The red LED colour is controlled by the current fixed and the intensity stop or tail light function is changed by pulse width modulation. PWM may operate at 100Hz, on at 100% for the stop function or on for 10% of the period, say for the tail light function.  Some LED types are specified to retain their colour over a wide current range and some batches of LEDs colour are stable over a range of current anyway.
 
Dynamometer tests (http://minisystem.blogspot.com/2011/11/) on a GH6 dynamo show, the dynamo's output reached 6V 300mA at 30KPH below this speed, that blog's LED lighting drew progressively less current.  For a 26' wheel which covers about 2M per revolution the output frequency would be 83Hz which would not produce any noticeable whereas 50Hz is noticeable. 
  • Therefore half-wave rectifier circuits (1) and 2 but without capacitors will noticeably flicker at 15KPH (41Hz).
  • The full-wave rectifier circuit (3 and 4) without the capacitors fitted may not noticeably flicker at 7KPH (41Hz).  The time that the rectified AC cycle is not carrying current is much shorter. 
Capacitor values are estimated based on simulation for <30% current ripple in the LED at a frequency of 20Hz.  Arbitrary White LED was chosen and scaled for RED LED in the LTspice simulation AL-0037-???.
 1) 100%  current;  Total = 5.7V = (White LED 4V) + (Red LED 1.7V). 
 
The LEDs will alternately illuminate with the generator's cycle of alternating current output.  At low speed, all LEDs turn off as the voltage transitions through 0V.  Together this may not look acceptable to oncoming traffic or pedestrians.
 
2) 50% current, Voltage drop;
  • Total = 4.4V (white) = (Diode 0.4V) + (White LED 4V) and
  • Total = 2.1V (red) = (Diode 0.4V) + (Red LED 1.7V).
Circuit 2 and 3;  If one Lamp is disconnected, the rectifiers will need to withstand at least 30V reverse voltage.  A Schottky rectifier rated at 50V or higher is required.
 
3) 100% current; Total 6.5V = (Diodes 0.8V = 2 x 0.4V) + (White LED 4V) + (Red LED 1.7V). 
The reservoir capacitors shown are much less necessary than they are in circuit 2 they can be of a lower value in circuit 3.
 
4) Voltage limited;
  • Input; 5.8V = 3.9V + 1.1V + 0.6V. Surplus power returned to the wheel. 
  • Output; 5.0V = 3.9V + 1.1V + 0.6V - (2 x 0.3V).
  • Therefore the output voltage full load 4.8V = 3.9V + 1.1V + 0.6V - (2 x 0.4V)
  • No allowance for temperature has been calculated but the voltage is likely to be 4.5V to 5.5V.
  • The extra power that was wasted by the triac (z01 ST) <300mW from a graph in the data sheet.  Compared to <2W for a Zener diode shunt regulator solution.
Provides enough voltage to run a USB device but the voltage being nearer the minimum be too low for that the device to charge at a good rate at the same time not so high to exceed 5.5V maximum. 
 
Simple Lighting systems suggestions (AL-0035-01C)
 
The LEDs may flicker a little but I have shown various mitigation measures and I also suggest using scavenged parts.

No allowance has been made for temperature and component tolerance (worse case design).

The RED LEDs will be much too bright in circuits 1, 2 and 3 without adding optical filtering.


DC-DC converters & LED drivers;
A variable voltage or LED driver from 5V input evaluation boards-
I have not evaluated any of these.
PAM2841SR boost LED driver 2.7V to 5V in. There is an evaluation board for this IC.  Note that the input voltage must be lower than the LEDs (in series) voltage drop so that the IC can regulate the current.
https://www.diodes.com/part/view/PAM2841?BackID=8072
There are many other manufactures and types such as PAM2803, ZXLD1321 that operates 1V to 3.3V at least.
 
ST buck-boost type use with circuit 4;

I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS SOLUTION BECAUSE I HAVE NO RECOMMENDATION FOR CALIBRATING THE LAMPS LIGHT INTENSITY AND PATTERN TO MEET ROAD STANDARDS FOR BICYCLES.   

By combining the voltage pre-regulator above and then using a cheaper semi-regulated function block should be cheaper than using the evaluation boards above solution.


Picture right;  Surface mount LEDs - A Printed Circuit Board can be made with a footprint pattern like the reverse side but as if you were looking through the parts from the top.   Design the board with components on one side only.  Place very small dots of solder paste onto the pads (it should look as if you have not got enough solder paste on the pads).  Then place the LEDs and other parts on the PCB you don't need to fit all parts at the same time or be overly careful to align them properly surface tension will cause the parts to pull to align (or miss-align).  Place the circuit board on a suitably pre-heated hotplate to solder all the parts.  Using tweezers to correct any parts that go out of alignment or tombstone (stand up).  Use pliers to remove the board from the heat.  The board will go brown because it has been overheated and for too long but your circuit will function fine - heating and cooling need to be done quickly without jarring the PCB.

No PCB needs to be designed and ordered if you unsolder the parts off of an old circuit board, cut the tracks as necessary and place your desired circuit and wires this works well.   Alternatively you can buy some stripboard or Vero board and do a similar thing with that but you probably will need to reduce the power rating of some parts such as LEDs in order to prevent them from overheating due to the lack of solder pad, copper area for heat-sinking.

Picture left - Stipboard or Veroboard can be used for prototyping of finished one-off design.  The prototype may be a mains power supply with switch-mode Lead-acid battery charging?  This type of prototyping can be good to see how a function works but usually, the function does not work so well unless the design is not demanding.


Alternative - Bicycle dynamo light and battery manager  ---  See Addendum at the bottom of the page and also see;  electronics-design-project-bicycle

----------------------
Links and references;
 
Tests of modern Hub dynamo efficiency's;

GH12 (1936-38) - Dynohub
GH6, hub dynamo, AG and FG variable gear hub-dynamos.

 
Note that the GH6 front wheel fitted type hub dynamo 
bearing adjustment is carried out from the non-dynamo 
side.   Unlike the AG variable gear dyno-hub.  

Magnet and magnetic material characteristic B-H curve.  B = Magnetic force and H = Amp turns the current in the wire and the number of turns of wire if there were no losses in the magnetic circuit.
https://www.coolmagnetman.com/magfund07.htm 
 
AlNiCo Magnet (aluminium, nickel, cobalt) material B-H curve shows the magnet can be magnetised at a lower degree of magnetism.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Magnetic-properties-of-the-Alnico-magnets-used-in-this-study-a-B-H-curves-b_fig2_321353387

https://www.eclipsemagnetics.com/media/wysiwyg/datasheets/magnet_materials_and_assemblies/alnico_magnets_datasheet_rev2.pdf

At very high temperatures, the material will de-magnetise called the curie point.  When the material cools again the magnetism can return.  This way is not used to magnetise the magnet.  The magnetisation is usually done after assembly with the material cold with a strong pulse electromagnetic field;
https://www.yymagnet.com/yangyi1/products/8853240.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwx9_4BRAHEiwApAt0zqVDYlQjnB1YsH9F0TeV_-hn1xV8H-icX9CbQ6n1N6_krgexdomfxxoCvAQQAvD_BwEHistoryry of modern magnetic material;
https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-eps/metallurgy/research/Magnetic-Materials-Background/Magnetic-Materials-Background-1-History.pdf
Another bicycle dynamo project I am unsure about the data and the project was not completed but there is a useful dynamometer graph for a Dynohub; http://minisystem.blogspot.com/2011/11/

I do not know anything about this company but they do offer a re-magnetising service.  They do magnetos which is what a Dynohub is but they are busy and it would probably be easier and cheaper to swap the inside from one hub to another.

Other links;

Pandemic cycling and bicycle selection going-forward  + Starting to ride a bicycle again.

Raleigh Lenton sports bicycle  + General maintenance advice, technical and history.

------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix; Motors that will also generate power; 
  • 1970's Impex 350mA, 5V/winding (4) 48 step stepper motor.
  • 1950s Induction motor (variable reluctance) - is not magnetised but will magnetise when connected to an AC power and spinning.  The capacitor provides a phase-shifted supply and sets the motor direction.  This motor will become a generator when spun a little faster than synchronising speed and put power back into the supply.  If disconnected the motor stops generating power safely.  But if capacitors are connected across the windings and the rotor has remnant magnetism some of these motors will build up magnetism and start to generate power when spinning.
  • Permanent magnet brush motor - will produce direct current if spun.
  • 1980's Astrosyn stepper motor; 24-step, 16V, 80ohms (200mA)/winding (4) - this has a much more powerful magnet than the 1970s Impex motor and is a more powerful motor it is smaller. 
    • This motor would make a good bicycle bottle generator. See below for experiments.
  • Central heating timer permanent magnet motor - this is like the dynamo in construction but turned inside out.
  • Hard disk stepper motor 8 pole - this will also generate but the voltage is so low that it would have no use.
Picture of a high number of steps, stepper motor. The shaft is mild steel and can bend easily so the coupling to the shaft must be flexible.  The construction is different from the dynamo with the two rotors are North and South poles of a central magnet so that the teeth then present alternate poles as the rotor turns.

Brush motors that have a hardened steel shaft have an insulator between the shaft and the motors magnetic parts.  No doubt the insulator prevents drain of magnetic power from the magnetic circuit.  The Dynohub is constructed similarly but for reason of avoiding avoiding unnecessary iron to magnetise.

The motor is assembled then the magnet is magnetised by a pulse from a high voltage source.  This type of construction is used from 24 up to 500 step hybrid stepper motors.

----------------------------------------------------------

Appendix; Bicycle dynamo lights and battery manager;
 
Microcontroller-based bicycle dynamo light and battery manager with a speedometer. Design idea and exercise with STM32 microcontroller. With interface by USB cable for speedometer display on a tablet for example. 
  • The Dynohub should output up to 20V when the bike is ridden fast I understand.  That is up to 7W.
  • Manage battery charging.  
  • Tilt sensor used to reduce the power taken from the dynamo using parameters set by the cyclist such as from a tablet computer connected. 
   
----------------------------------------------------------

Appendix; Experimental Bicycle bottle dynamo lighting 

Astrosyn stepper motor; 24-step, 16V, 80ohms (200mA)/winding (4) - in experiments produces >35Vac at 25mAac, see link below. The motor makes a good bicycle bottle generator although the sleeve bearings will wear out sooner than a ball bearing type motor. By nature of its cheaper construction be less efficient.

   

I have glued a wood wheel with some inner tube onto the motor but unfortunately, it is not centralised.  Circuit right AL-0035-05A;
  • Running, say, four times two strings anti-parallel of 11 LEDs in series.  Total 88 LEDs and gives some parallel redundancy in case of an LED failing but is less useful.  This would be the most efficient option.  {Picture right 1A but with all blocks of LEDs fitted}. 
  • Full-wave rectifier with the centre tap running two 11 LEDs in series.  Total 22 LEDs, uses less wiring and has redundancy.  {Picture above 3A but with all blocks of LEDs fitted}.
  • Center tapped winding full-wave rectifier running a 11 LED string.  Total 11 LEDs, is less efficient because the resistance loss in the winding is higher. {Picture above 3A}. 
   

The arithmetic and some experimentation for this experimental bottle generator see; https://blog.andrew-lohmann.me.uk/2020/09/electronics-design-project-bicycle.html